![]() It's going to take up about same or even smaller footprint as this one (the tubes are exact same diameter, just dob is about 8" longer, and probably 4-6" more if you count the base. Personally, I would recommend an 8" dob, just like /u/nobbs66 said. It comes with a 2" dual-speed crayford focuser, enlarged secondary mirror, and longer backfocus to accommodate DSLRs and other cameras with accessories. PDS is the astrophotography-geared variant. What is the difference between the 200p and the 200pds? ![]() It'll work for the scope, but expect to have vibrations and certainly don't plan on having any decent astrophotography with this. It seems to be a well reviewed scope but is there anything that I should have that this is missing?įirstly, the mount is barely cutting it there. It seems to be a well reviewed scope but is there anything that I should have that this is missing? (This is my first Newtonian so I will have to learn how to collimate)Īlso there is a 200pds version. X2 Deluxe Barlow Lens 1.25" (with Camera Adaptor)Ġ.5mm Ultra-Thin Secondary Mirror Supportsġ.75" Stainless Steel Pipe Tripod with Accessory Tray ![]() Highest Practical Power (Potential): x400 Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x40, x80, x100, x200 ![]() I’ve been looking at this Explorer 200p EQ5 scope and mount but am looking for some advice on it I’m looking at upgrading from my 60mm spotting scope to something a bit more serious. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |